Manifesto of the communist party By Karl Marx
...The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.
It is more often than not seen that literature on historical movements loses its significance with time. This book ,however, is a paradigm of the opposite. Karl Marx has not only described the philosophy of communism, but has also taken up the cudgels on the behalf of the communists and answered each accusation rhetorically.
This book first describes what communism preaches, then addresses charges against communisms, censures bourgeois for manipulating the meaning of “freedom”,”property” and “reward” and finally describes how communism is being forwarded in each country. The writing is not readily comprehensible and might take getting used to. This is because all the statements of this book assume that the reader has a background of the world when this movement emerged.Hence, It is esoteric in the sense that it will be comprehended by historians and politics students more efficaciously than by the general readers. Also, the statements given in this book seem to be deducing general principles from general principles ,thus lowering the logical soundness of this work. Notwithstanding these flaws, this book will make the reader understand human fixation to “changing the world”. It will, at a juncture, even project that communists are striving just for “change” with or without betterment. In the end the reader must ask himself whether Polybius’ sequence of anacyclosis: monarchy to kingship to tyranny to aristocracy to oligarchy to democracy to ochlocracy will ever stop and whether people will ever grow tire of “change”.
...The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.
It is more often than not seen that literature on historical movements loses its significance with time. This book ,however, is a paradigm of the opposite. Karl Marx has not only described the philosophy of communism, but has also taken up the cudgels on the behalf of the communists and answered each accusation rhetorically.
This book first describes what communism preaches, then addresses charges against communisms, censures bourgeois for manipulating the meaning of “freedom”,”property” and “reward” and finally describes how communism is being forwarded in each country. The writing is not readily comprehensible and might take getting used to. This is because all the statements of this book assume that the reader has a background of the world when this movement emerged.Hence, It is esoteric in the sense that it will be comprehended by historians and politics students more efficaciously than by the general readers. Also, the statements given in this book seem to be deducing general principles from general principles ,thus lowering the logical soundness of this work. Notwithstanding these flaws, this book will make the reader understand human fixation to “changing the world”. It will, at a juncture, even project that communists are striving just for “change” with or without betterment. In the end the reader must ask himself whether Polybius’ sequence of anacyclosis: monarchy to kingship to tyranny to aristocracy to oligarchy to democracy to ochlocracy will ever stop and whether people will ever grow tire of “change”.